[ad_1]
AFP information company launched a copyright case in France on Wednesday in opposition to social media large Twitter, not too long ago rebranded X, a part of a world wrestle to get tech corporations to pay for information.
Media teams have lengthy argued that their tales and pictures carry worth to platforms like X, Fb and Google, that means they need to get a slice of the income.
Their trigger was boosted by a 2019 EU legislation that allowed for funds for sharing content material underneath a regime known as “neighbouring rights”, and Google and Fb finally agreed to pay some French media shops.
However AFP has accused X, owned by billionaire tycoon Elon Musk, of a “clear refusal” to interact in discussions on neighbouring rights.
AFP stated in an announcement it had lodged a case with a choose in Paris to power the platform handy over knowledge that may permit the French information company to estimate a good stage of compensation.
“As a number one advocate for the adoption of neighbouring rights for the press, AFP stays unwavering in its dedication to the trigger,” the assertion stated.
“The Company will proceed to make use of the suitable authorized means with every related platform to make sure the truthful distribution of the worth generated by the sharing of stories content material.”
Contacted by AFP, the corporate was not instantly out there for remark.
Though media teams in France have received some victories, massive tech corporations have pushed again onerous in different areas.
Meta blocked customers of Fb and Instagram in Canada from seeing posts from information organisations this week over a legislation that mandates compensation for the content material.
Google has threatened to take comparable motion.
Meta and Google additionally opposed comparable proposals in Australia.
The 2 corporations dominate internet marketing and stand accused of draining money away from conventional information organisations whereas utilizing their content material totally free.
X, as a a lot smaller platform, has not confronted the identical stage of scrutiny.
[ad_2]
Source link
